Wild Card Game: Cardinals 6, Braves 3

October 6, 2012 at 2:08 am by under Atlanta Braves


Source: FanGraphs

Game MVP: David Ross, .296
Least Valuable Brave: Dan Uggla, -.144
Most Valuable Cardinal: Matt Holliday, .261
Least Valuable Cardinal: Jon Jay, -.053
Big plays:
2nd – (ATL) David Ross two-run homer for a 2-0 Braves lead, .209
4th – (STL) Chipper Jones error puts runners on corners with no outs, .113
4th – (STL) Allen Craig RBI double for a 2-1 Braves lead, .142
6th – (STL) Matt Holliday solo homer for a 4-2 Cardinals lead, .130

First of all, the fact that Major League Baseball would even allow the Braves to be put in this situation reflects on its lack of competence. To have a baseball team play 162 games over six-plus months only to determine its fate for the entire year over a span of three hours is complete idiocy. This is compounded by the fact that a human has the ability to make one single judgment call that can make or break a team’s entire year. I’m sure MLB got its ratings. It got people talking about the sport. It grabbed the next day’s headlines. It also lost credibility, not only on the field with the umpires but in its leadership roles. Major League Baseball wanted to create a drama-filled show but got a circus.

The infield fly call was wrong. You don’t even have to fully understand the rule to know the call was missed. Pete Kozma did not reach “ordinary effort” under the ball, no matter how badly Sam Holbrook wishes that was the case. And people can talk about his feet shuffling and whether he was camped under the ball all they want. Lost in all of this is the fact that Kozma is nearly in Matt Holliday’s spot in left field. If MLB wants to get away with this being a “judgment call,” they should take a look at how far Kozma is in left field and judge that the infield fly rule is no longer a legit call that far out. MLB will say whatever is easiest in order to sweep this under the rug and move on, and that’s exactly what we got out of its leadership after the game.

The Braves messed themselves up before any infield fly call was made. Chipper’s error in the fourth gave the lead up and was perhaps the biggest mistake. They attempted a safety squeeze with runners on the corners, one out and the pitcher on deck, which is just unheard of. Dan Uggla and Andrelton Simmons committed errors in the seventh that led to a bigger hole. In the midst of all that happened in the eighth, they still had a shot to get back in the game but left the bases loaded.

It’s just about the worst way you can draw up the end of the season and Chipper’s career. Plenty of it was the Braves’ own faults, plenty of it can be put on the umpires, plenty of it can be put on MLB. Add it all up and you get a disappointing final loss for what is a solid team.

I’m going into hibernation for a while.

76 Responses to “Wild Card Game: Cardinals 6, Braves 3”

  1. KevinK says:

    There should be a revision to this new WC rule where if Team B isn’t within X amt (I suggest 5) of wins of Team A, Team A wins by default and there isn’t a game.

    I haven’t seen this suggested yet. I understand how this game could decide between two teams with almost identical records. Keeping the format the same will not encourage future teams to play hard at the end of the year if they are locked into a WC spot. What was the perk for the Braves of winning 7-8 more games than any other WC team? Home field? Overrated in baseball.

  2. Michael says:

    Is it next season yet?? :(

  3. bozz says:

    I don’t know if it’s just me, but none of the playoff teams so far have looked incredibly impressive. I am surprised the Giants are down 0-2, though, and I was really hoping the As would make a surprise run and not be in a hole the way they are now.

    Anyone want to talk Braves or should we give it some more time?

    • Michael says:

      I think everyone is still pretty sore about it, but probably willing to talk. We’re just missing starting points from the bloggers.

      However, although Jim Bowden is a freaking moron, I’m still interested in what he has to say about the Braves and Rangers this off-season located here…
      http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/the-gms-office/post?id=5124

      But, it’s pretty obvious that our main concerns are CF, 3B and LF. Sadly, each position is dependent on what happens with the other. I.E. if we re-sign Bourn we can shift monies toward either finding a big bat for LF and move Prado into 3B or find someone that can mash left-handers for LF and Prado can split with Francisco at 3B. There’s just a plethora of options.

      • Michael says:

        And for clarification purposes, I’m not meaning Prado only plays 3B, splitting time with Roadrunner. I’m implying he plays LF mainly and then 3B when a LH starts.

  4. Chris W says:

    I would like to know what the difference in the ‘win probability’ (or whatever you call it) was after the ‘infield fly’ call was made, as opposed to what it would’ve been if the call weren’t made (and we had bases loaded with one out).

  5. Mo says:

    So we selectively edit out uncomfortable truths here at Capitol Avenue Club? There was no reason to delete my post pointing out that the Braves got a huge call to go their way when Ross was granted the late time out in the 2nd inning, and with the second chance, instead of striking out, he was able to launch a 2-run bomb.

    Don’t bury your heads in the sand, Braves fans.

Leave a Reply